A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between prospective neighbours above the development of a wall in a coastal internet site in the north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national consideration adhering to an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed household home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of organizing breaches, environmental considerations, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier and the Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has progressed into a extremely publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about construction functions at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, seek out to develop their family house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, where by growth pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of established citizens. Based on the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming manufactured by their potential neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their organizing permission by creating a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, therefore spots are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have lasting ecological consequences, specially within a sensitive coastal environment which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their organizing permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partially crafted, is in the correct situation. Their lawful group has characterised the action being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can protect their check out, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular efforts because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn proof referenced within the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-higher h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, a picture that has given that develop into emblematic from the intensity in the dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they have been intended to Get Visible evidence of the wall’s placement relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Instances documented, describing how the two Males entered the water throughout severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the internet site turned Probably the most putting descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps have been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a location affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been included intimately from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 grew to become extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to additional submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment in the legal timeline.
With the Main of the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as created, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and disorders connected into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is motivated by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A personal perspective, insisting instead that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their very long-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple only looking to develop a family dwelling in accordance with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Specific Location of Conservation and say that all works happen to be performed based upon Qualified suggestions and approved plans. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with coming into the sea through a storm, don't alter the underlying facts.
The case has also raised broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about design of wall at coastal web page has grown to be a shorthand description to get a situation a large number of observers see as increasingly widespread. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation concerning private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become extra contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier observed which the businessman had Earlier been involved with area advocacy on planning and environmental problems, although not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from extremely unique professional backgrounds can find themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Situations protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions and René Collier waded as a result of waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the Bodily truth in the coastline and also the symbolic nature on the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times being an excessive solution.
Because the High Court proceedings continue on, the outcome remains unsure. The court ought to identify whether or not the wall as built complies with scheduling authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Unique Spot of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and arranging problems. Yet the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Are living together with each other long once the legal expenditures have been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about construction performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, however the implications of the case prolong past that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. Additionally, it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental problems for instance environmental defense and house rights are perceived to get at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of organic splendor and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized inquiries. Whether or not it'll finally be altered, taken off, or finished as planned will depend on the court’s results. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely keep on to seem in headlines, joined indelibly to The most closely watched setting up disputes in north Dublin in recent years.