A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between possible neighbours above the development of a wall in a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has captivated countrywide consideration next an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members household at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of preparing breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times article about René Collier plus the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development functions at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to make their family members residence. The case is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, the place enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of proven citizens. According to the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being manufactured by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted under planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their setting up authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment on the Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result parts are issue to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental regulation. Inside their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially within a delicate coastal environment which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their organizing authorization, and say the wall, that is partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in order to maintain their watch, an allegation that has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal organizing disputes, the place views of The ocean are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, In accordance with sworn proof referenced within the Irish Situations. In one account, Rene Collier waded by waist-high drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, an image which includes considering the fact that turn out to be emblematic on the depth with the dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they were meant to gather Visible proof on the wall’s posture relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Periods claimed, describing how the two Males entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become Just about the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail because of the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court heard further submissions on no matter if interim orders should be granted to halt building pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
At the core on the dispute is often a disagreement in excess of boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has become called meticulous in his examination of organizing documents, maps, and ailments hooked up on the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their motion is motivated by problem for environmental defense and adherence to planning law. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A personal view, insisting instead that it's about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've explained their lengthy-standing relationship to the area and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a few merely endeavoring to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and permitted plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, including coming into The ocean throughout a storm, tend not to change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times over design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waistline-significant water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth from the coastline along with the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the result stays unsure. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles like environmental defense and home legal rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently watched scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.